---
title: "Best Speech to Text APIs for Voice Agents in 2026"
description: "Ten streaming speech to text APIs ranked for voice agents on accuracy, time to final transcript, turn detection, languages and price per minute."
url: "https://micdrop.dev/blog/top-speech-to-text-apis-voice-agents"
---

# The best speech to text APIs for voice agents in 2026

Ten streaming speech to text APIs ranked for voice agents on accuracy, time to final transcript, turn detection, languages and price per minute.

October 16, 2026

[Godefroy de Compreignac](https://github.com/Godefroy)

Updated on October 22, 2026

Key takeaways

*   A voice agent waits for the final transcript of each sentence before it answers, so the time between the last word and that transcript matters more than how fast partial words appear.
*   AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro had the lowest error rate on the Coval benchmark in October 2026, at 2.1%, with its final transcript 134 ms after the end of speech. Deepgram returned final transcripts fastest on the same benchmark, 85 to 98 ms after the end of speech.
*   Streaming transcription costs from $0.002 a minute on Soniox to $0.017 a minute on OpenAI gpt-live-transcribe in 2026.
*   Most streaming APIs now detect the end of the user's turn themselves, Mistral Voxtral Realtime 3 among them when you turn it on. OpenAI gpt-live-transcribe still expects your code to say when the sentence is over.
*   Mistral is the only ranked provider that publishes a streaming model as open weights, so you can run the first Voxtral Realtime on your own GPU under Apache 2.0.

The best speech to text API for a voice agent in 2026 is AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro when accuracy comes first, and Deepgram Flux when every millisecond counts. AssemblyAI had the lowest error rate on the Coval benchmark in October 2026, while Deepgram returned its final transcripts fastest there. ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime, Soniox, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe and Speechmatics complete the top six. This ranking compares ten streaming APIs on what a voice agent needs from transcription: the time to the final transcript, accuracy, built-in turn detection, languages, price per minute and where the audio is processed.

Micdrop publishes this ranking. [Micdrop](/) is an open source TypeScript library for real-time voice conversations with AI. It does no transcription itself, so it has no place in the ranking. It ships ready integrations for OpenAI, Gemini, Mistral, Gladia and Gradium, plus one interface for plugging in any other API. Coval measured a higher error rate for Gladia than for every ranked API it covers. Gradium returned its final transcript later than every ranked API in the Pipecat benchmark. Both stay outside the top ten.

Prices come from each vendor’s pricing page. Accuracy and speed figures come from independent benchmarks, unless the text marks them as the vendor’s own. All figures were collected on 16 October 2026, and on 22 October for Mistral. Providers release a new model every few weeks, so check the numbers again before you commit.

## How the APIs were ranked

A voice agent answers a sentence only once it has its final transcript. The user waits for that transcript, then for [the language model](/blog/top-llms-voice-agents) and the voice. The ranking weighs these criteria:

*   the word error rate (WER) and the time from the end of speech to the final transcript
*   whether the API detects the end of the user’s turn itself, or leaves that to your code
*   the languages it transcribes in streaming, and whether one call can switch between them
*   the price per minute of streamed audio
*   where the audio can be processed, including a European region, and whether you can host the model yourself

The two main benchmarks are [Coval](https://benchmarks.coval.ai), which tests hosted endpoints continuously and reports 30-day averages, and the [Artificial Analysis streaming leaderboard](https://artificialanalysis.ai/speech-to-text/streaming), which measures from the end of speech detected by a voice detector. They use different audio and start timing from different moments, so compare two APIs within one benchmark only. The [Pipecat benchmark](https://github.com/pipecat-ai/stt-benchmark), run on 1,000 English turns in September 2026, adds a third measure, and the only one for Cartesia.

An API enters the ranking once it is generally available and documents how it handles the audio, with a processing region or a security certification. That rule leaves out two strong newcomers, Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming and Meta Muse Voice Transcribe, covered after the ranking. The order is our judgement, with no weighted score behind it. The time to the final transcript and the error rate weigh most. When one API is faster and another more accurate, we looked at turn detection, languages and European processing to order them.

## The comparison at a glance

API and streaming model

Price per minute

Coval WER, time to final

Artificial Analysis WER, time to final

Languages in streaming

Turn detection in the API

EU processing

**AssemblyAI** Universal-3.6 Pro

$0.0075

2.1%, 134 ms

Not listed for this model

32, code switching

Yes

EU endpoint

**Deepgram** Flux, Nova-3

$0.0048 to $0.0065, promotional

5.3 to 5.8%, 85 to 98 ms

6.7%, 60 ms (Nova-3)

About 63, switching in 10

Yes, model based (Flux)

EU endpoint

**ElevenLabs** Scribe v2 Realtime

$0.0065

4.3%, 121 ms

3.6%, 140 ms

90+

Yes

Enterprise plan only

**Soniox** stt-rt-v5

$0.002

Not listed

4.5%, 54 ms

60+, code switching

Yes

EU region on request

**Google** Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live

About $0.009

3.0%, 321 ms

4.0%, 400 ms

85+, code switching

Voice detection

EU endpoint on Google Cloud

**Speechmatics** Linden 1

$0.005

3.9%, 275 ms

Not listed

55+, one per stream

Silence based

EU endpoint, on premises

**xAI** Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0

$0.0033

Not listed

2.7%, 490 ms

38+, switching

Yes

None published

**Cartesia** Ink-2

$0.0065 on Scale

Not listed

Not verified

5

Yes

None published

**OpenAI** gpt-4o-transcribe, gpt-live-transcribe

$0.003 to $0.017

3.7%, 786 ms (gpt-4o-transcribe)

Not listed for these models

Many, set by a hint

gpt-4o-transcribe only

EU endpoint, 10% extra

**Mistral** Voxtral Realtime 3

$0.008

5.3%, 418 ms (first version)

5.3% (first version)

40+

Yes, when turned on

Default, or self-hosted

The two benchmarks measure on different audio, so compare APIs within one column only. Across every model Coval tracks, the median time to the final transcript is 195 ms.

## The ranking

### 1\. AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro

![Screenshot of the AssemblyAI homepage, presenting voice AI infrastructure with a realtime speech to text demo](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fassemblyai.Dp-9WDQH.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[AssemblyAI](https://www.assemblyai.com) released Universal-3.6 Pro Realtime on 29 September 2026. Coval ranks it first on accuracy out of 31 models, at 2.1% WER, with its final transcript 134 ms after the end of speech.

The model decides from punctuation and meaning when the user has finished. It keeps the turn open while the caller is still spelling out a phone number, an email address or a street name. Booking and support agents often cut the caller off at that moment. You can add up to 100 keyterms and change them in the middle of a stream. Universal-3.6 Pro handles 32 languages and switches between them inside a sentence.

The [price](https://www.assemblyai.com/pricing) is $0.45 an hour, about $0.0075 a minute, keyterms included. AssemblyAI bills the whole length of the session, idle time included, so close the stream between turns. It has an EU streaming endpoint, SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA, and sells self-hosted streaming from a $20,000 commitment. Its JavaScript SDK runs on the server only. Retell, LiveKit, Zoom and Metaview appear among its customers.

### 2\. Deepgram Flux and Nova-3

![Screenshot of the Deepgram homepage, presenting Flux as voice AI built for real conversations](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fdeepgram.BcSiKPP6.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[Deepgram](https://deepgram.com) returns final transcripts faster than any other ranked API on Coval, 85 ms after the end of speech for Nova-3 and 98 ms for Flux. Twilio, Daily, LiveKit and Granola appear among the customers on Deepgram’s homepage.

Flux is the model to pick for a conversation. A neural model, rather than a silence timer, decides when the user is done, and sends `EndOfTurn`, `EagerEndOfTurn` and `TurnResumed` events. The eager event lets the agent start preparing its answer before the turn is confirmed. Deepgram warns that this raises language model calls by 50 to 70%. Nova-3 covers about 63 languages. Both models switch between 10 of them within one call.

Deepgram trails the leaders on accuracy. Coval puts Nova-3 at 5.3% WER, 20th of 31, and Flux at 5.8%. The [streaming prices](https://deepgram.com/pricing) are promotional: Flux English costs $0.0065 a minute against a list price of $0.0077, and Nova-3 $0.0048 against $0.0077. Deepgram runs a generally available EU endpoint and sells self-hosting with an Enterprise licence. Its TypeScript SDK runs in Node and the browser.

### 3\. ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime

![Screenshot of the ElevenLabs speech to text page, presenting Scribe v2 Realtime with a live transcription demo](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Felevenlabs.C157T7HE.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime](https://elevenlabs.io/speech-to-text) has the lowest error rate of the ranked models that finalise in under 150 ms on Artificial Analysis, 3.6% WER with the final transcript 140 ms after the end of speech. Coval measures it at 4.3% and 121 ms. It transcribes more than 90 languages. Its `secondary_languages` setting lists the other languages to expect in the same call.

Scribe commits a transcript in one of three ways: on your signal, after a silence threshold, or, since October 2026, through a turn prediction model that returns a turn probability.

The [price](https://elevenlabs.io/pricing/api) is $0.39 an hour, about $0.0065 a minute, on every plan, plus $0.08 an hour for keyterms. The JavaScript and React SDKs issue single-use tokens, so a browser can connect without exposing the API key. ElevenLabs holds SOC 2, ISO 27001 and PCI DSS Level 1, but reserves European data residency and zero retention for Enterprise contracts. Its first partial word arrives late, 2.2 seconds on Coval, which matters only to an interface that shows words while the user speaks.

### 4\. Soniox

![Screenshot of the Soniox homepage, showing its speech AI platform with a voice demo](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fsoniox.XOUK9b5f.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[Soniox](https://soniox.com) is the cheapest ranked API by a wide margin, at [$0.12 an hour](https://soniox.com/pricing), about $0.002 a minute, with speaker labels and language identification included. Its stt-rt-v5 model, released in June 2026, also returns the fastest final transcripts on Artificial Analysis, 54 ms after the end of speech, at 4.5% WER.

One model covers more than 60 languages and follows a speaker who changes language within a session. Soniox detects the end of a turn from pauses, intonation and context, with an adjustable sensitivity. It accepts up to 8,000 tokens of context for names and domain terms. SDKs cover Node, the browser, React and React Native.

Soniox publishes no latency or accuracy figure of its own and names a single customer, the German voicebot company mobilApp. Artificial Analysis rated the previous version at 11.9% WER in June 2026, so expect these numbers to keep moving. Soniox processes and stores the audio in an EU region when you ask its sales team. Soniox holds SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA and ISO 27001.

### 5\. Google Gemini 3.5 Transcribe Live

![Screenshot of the Gemini API audio transcription documentation, presenting the Gemini 3.5 Transcribe model](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fgemini.DTL9uho4.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[Gemini 3.5 Transcribe](https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/transcribe), released on 26 August 2026, is the second most accurate ranked model on Coval, at 3.0% WER, with its final transcript 321 ms after the end of speech. Artificial Analysis gives 4.0% and 400 ms. Google reports that its final transcript arrives 70% faster than with Chirp 3, the model it replaces.

The live version, `gemini-3.5-transcribe-live`, streams over the Gemini Live API and recognises more than 85 languages, including several in the same session. It accepts up to 1,000 custom vocabulary terms, the most in this ranking along with Speechmatics. Turn detection runs on voice activity, automatic or driven by your own signal.

The [price](https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing) is $3.50 per million audio tokens in and $21 per million tokens out, which Google estimates at about $0.009 a minute. A live session lasts ten minutes at most, so your code has to open a new one for a longer call. The model is in public preview on the Gemini API and generally available on Google Cloud’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, with an `eu` endpoint there. The `@google/genai` SDK issues ephemeral tokens for the browser.

### 6\. Speechmatics Linden 1

![Screenshot of the Speechmatics homepage, presenting speech APIs for voice AI in more than 55 languages](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fspeechmatics.BX6iGCNf.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[Speechmatics](https://www.speechmatics.com) launched Agent STT on its Linden 1 model on 17 September 2026. Coval measures it at 3.9% WER and 275 ms. It scored 1.05% semantic WER in the Pipecat benchmark, among the lowest in that run, with a median of 369 ms to the final transcript.

Linden 1 costs [$0.30 an hour](https://www.speechmatics.com/pricing), $0.005 a minute, and $0.15 an hour with volume. It covers more than 55 languages, takes a custom dictionary of up to 1,000 words and labels speakers at no extra cost. Speechmatics has the widest deployment choice of the ranked providers: cloud endpoints in the EU, the US and Australia, containers on your own servers, or on device. It holds ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA. Vapi, LiveKit and the medical assistant Nabla use it.

Each stream handles one language, except bilingual packs such as Spanish and English. Speechmatics lists semantic turn detection as coming soon. Until then, end of turn detection relies on silence, so an agent that needs semantic turn detection has to run it in its own code.

### 7\. xAI Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0

![Screenshot of the xAI Grok Voice API page, presenting speech to speech, text to speech and speech to text APIs](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fxai.B9xywbSE.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0](https://docs.x.ai/developers/model-capabilities/audio/speech-to-text), released by xAI on 18 September 2026, has the lowest error rate of the generally available models on Artificial Analysis, at 2.7% WER. Its final transcript arrives 490 ms after the end of speech, slower than Deepgram, ElevenLabs and Soniox on that benchmark.

It costs $0.20 an hour, about $0.0033 a minute, with speaker labels, timestamps and up to 100 keyterms included. It handles more than 38 languages and follows a switch in the middle of a recording. A `smart_turn` setting adds a model that predicts the end of the turn. Loom, at Atlassian, transcribes every video with it.

xAI holds SOC 2 Type 2, offers HIPAA on request, and keeps data 30 days by default unless you choose zero retention. It has no European region. With no ephemeral token, a browser has to reach the API through your own server. The documentation shows only raw WebSocket examples.

### 8\. Cartesia Ink-2

![Screenshot of the Cartesia Ink page, presenting Ink as a speech to text model built for voice agents](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fcartesia.B0NVTZxx.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[Cartesia](https://cartesia.ai/ink), the San Francisco company behind the Sonic voices, built Ink-2 for voice agents. Ink-2 sends its own turn events, `turn.start`, `turn.eager_end`, `turn.resume` and `turn.end`, so the agent needs no separate voice detector. It scored 1.02% semantic WER in the Pipecat benchmark, among the lowest in that run, with a median of 299 ms to the final transcript.

Ink-2 covers fewer languages than any other ranked API, five: English, French, Hindi, Japanese and Spanish. The older Ink-Whisper model still covers 100. In the same Pipecat run, the slowest 1% of Ink-2 turns took 1,584 ms, five times the median.

Cartesia bills [three credits per second](https://cartesia.ai/pricing), about $0.39 an hour on the $299 Scale plan, with 20,000 free credits to start. Cartesia has Python and TypeScript SDKs and integrations for LiveKit, Vapi and Pipecat. Cartesia holds SOC 2 Type II and sells on-premises or VPC deployment, without a published European region. ServiceNow, HeyGen and Synthesia appear on its Ink-2 announcement.

### 9\. OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe and gpt-live-transcribe

![Screenshot of the OpenAI developer documentation on transcription](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fopenai.BLHAIaxN.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[OpenAI](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/realtime-transcription) has two kinds of streaming models. `gpt-4o-transcribe`, at about $0.006 a minute, and `gpt-4o-mini-transcribe`, at $0.003, run inside a Realtime transcription session with OpenAI’s own voice detection, including a semantic mode that waits for the sentence to make sense. Coval measures gpt-4o-transcribe at 3.7% WER with its final transcript 786 ms after the end of speech, the slowest of the ranked APIs.

`gpt-live-transcribe`, released on 29 July 2026, is the model OpenAI now recommends for live audio. Its `delay` setting trades speed for accuracy. It accepts a `keywords` list as well as a free text prompt. OpenAI reports 9.6% WER on its own real-world set across nine languages. It costs [$0.017 a minute](https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing), the most expensive ranked option, and has no server-side voice detection, so your code has to detect the end of speech and commit the audio.

OpenAI processes data in Europe through `eu.api.openai.com`, at 10% extra for models released since March 2026. OpenAI sells no self-hosted option. Its realtime models return no speaker labels or timestamps.

### 10\. Mistral Voxtral Realtime 3

![Screenshot of the Mistral announcement of Voxtral 3, published on 20 October 2026](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fmistral.wiMe-bo8.png&w=1920&h=1080&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

[Mistral](https://mistral.ai/news/voxtral-3) released Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime 3 on 20 October 2026, as `voxtral-mini-transcribe-realtime-3-0`. It recognises more than 40 languages in streaming, against 13 for the first version, although the benchmark Mistral publishes covers 35. Mistral announces a final transcript in under 500 ms. [We measured a median of about 590 ms](/blog/gpt-4o-transcribe-vs-gemini-vs-voxtral) on 22 October. No independent benchmark lists version 3 yet.

The hosted API costs [$0.008 a minute](https://docs.mistral.ai/models/voxtral-mini-transcribe-realtime-3-0). A streaming delay setting sets how long the model waits before writing a word, from 80 ms to 2.4 seconds, and Mistral charts its error rate on FLEURS at 240, 480, 960 and 2,400 ms. Version 3 detects the end of the turn from sound and meaning when you turn it on. It can also label speakers in streaming, in a session without turn detection, and accepts context biasing. The [Micdrop Mistral integration](/docs/ai-integration/provided-integrations/mistral) uses version 3 by default.

Mistral publishes the weights of the first version, `voxtral-mini-transcribe-realtime-2602`, under Apache 2.0. It is the only ranked model you can download and run on your own GPU, through vLLM with an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, and its 4 billion parameters fit on a single GPU. Coval measures that first version at 5.3% WER and 418 ms to the final transcript, and Artificial Analysis also at 5.3%. Version 3 runs on Mistral’s API, or on your servers through a deal with Mistral. Mistral, based in Paris, processes data in Europe by default.

## Strong newcomers outside the ranking

[Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/speech-service/mai-transcribe-2-streaming) took first place on Artificial Analysis on 1 October 2026, at 2.5% WER with its final transcript 128 ms after the end of speech. It is still a public preview with no SLA, served from four regions including Sweden Central. [TestingCatalog reports](https://www.testingcatalog.com/microsoft-launches-mai-transcribe-2-streaming/) an introductory price of $0.54 an hour. Once the model is generally available, it could enter this ranking near the top.

[Meta Muse Voice Transcribe](https://dev.meta.ai/models/muse-voice-transcribe/), launched on 1 September 2026, costs $0.18 an hour. Artificial Analysis measures it at 3.1% WER with its final transcript 160 ms after the end of speech. Meta documents no processing region, certification or customer for it yet, which keeps it out of this ranking. Its examples cover Python only.

## Other speech to text APIs worth knowing

[Gladia](https://www.gladia.io), a French company acquired by OVHcloud on 31 July 2026, recognises more than 100 languages and stores data in Europe or the United States. Real-time transcription costs from €0.68 an hour. Coval measures its Solaria-1 model at 6.1% WER and 556 ms.

[Gradium](https://gradium.ai), a Paris spin-off of the Kyutai lab, transcribes five European languages, with an EU endpoint and a self-hosted option. The Pipecat benchmark measured a median of 585 ms to its final transcript. [Reson8](https://reson8.dev), in Amsterdam, runs 10 European languages on its own GPUs in the Netherlands.

[Amazon Transcribe](https://aws.amazon.com/transcribe/) at $0.01 a minute, Azure AI Speech at $1 an hour and Google Cloud’s Chirp 3 from $0.016 a minute all take more than 600 ms to the final transcript on independent benchmarks. They mostly suit teams already running on that cloud. [Rev AI](https://www.rev.ai) streams nine languages and scored 10.1% WER on Artificial Analysis.

Open source engines such as Whisper, Moonshine and Kyutai STT can [transcribe speech locally in Node](/blog/local-speech-to-text-node), with no per-minute bill. The browser’s own [Web Speech API](/blog/web-speech-api) costs nothing but behaves differently from one browser to the next.

## How to choose between them

Start from the language of your calls. An English agent can use any ranked API. When callers switch language mid-call, pick AssemblyAI, Soniox, Gemini, ElevenLabs or xAI, or Deepgram within its 10 switching languages. Cartesia covers five languages and Mistral more than 40.

Then look at the time to the final transcript, measured from where your server runs. Deepgram, ElevenLabs, AssemblyAI and Soniox return it in about 150 ms or less, against 786 ms for OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe. In [Micdrop](/docs/ai-integration), the voice detection in the browser closes the turn and tells the API the sentence is complete, so the delay that counts is the one after that signal. On 28 September 2026 we measured that delay for two of the integrated providers, with [Gemini at about 320 ms median and Gladia at about 480 ms](/blog/gpt-4o-transcribe-vs-gemini-vs-voxtral). Gemini’s figure matches Coval’s 321 ms. Gladia came out faster in our test than on Coval, which gives 556 ms.

Built-in turn detection saves code when your stack has none. Deepgram Flux, AssemblyAI and Soniox decide the end of turn from meaning as well as silence. Micdrop already closes the turn in the browser and adds [semantic end of turn detection](/docs/server/semantic-turn-detection) on the server, so a model without turn detection, such as gpt-live-transcribe, needs no extra code in Micdrop.

Price matters at volume. A thousand hours of calls costs $120 on Soniox, $200 on xAI, $300 on Speechmatics, $390 on ElevenLabs, $450 on AssemblyAI and $1,020 on gpt-live-transcribe.

European teams can narrow the list by where the audio is processed. AssemblyAI, Deepgram, Speechmatics, Soniox, Google and OpenAI can process audio in Europe, Mistral by default. ElevenLabs reserves European residency for Enterprise plans. xAI and Cartesia publish no European region. You can [keep every step of the pipeline in Europe](/docs/ai-integration/sovereign-voice-ai) with Mistral, Gladia and Gradium.

Plan for outages too, since a voice agent stops answering when its transcription provider goes down. In Micdrop, every integration implements the same interface, so switching from Gemini to Mistral means replacing one line. [`FallbackSTT`](/docs/ai-integration/fallback-strategies/stt-fallback) moves to a second provider when the first one fails, and replays the audio of the sentence in progress. Raconte, a voice interview product built by Micdrop’s maintainer, runs Gladia first with OpenAI as its fallback. You can connect an API without a ready integration, such as AssemblyAI or Deepgram, by writing a [custom speech to text class](/docs/ai-integration/custom-integrations/custom-stt) with a single `transcribe()` method.

## Frequently asked questions

### What is the best speech to text API for voice agents in 2026?

AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro had the lowest error rate on the Coval benchmark in October 2026, at 2.1%, with its final transcript 134 ms after the end of speech. Deepgram Flux returns final transcripts faster, in about 100 ms, and detects the end of turn with a model. ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime and Soniox combine low error rates with very fast final transcripts. Gemini 3.5 Transcribe suits multilingual agents with a long custom vocabulary.

### Which speech to text API has the lowest latency?

On Artificial Analysis, Soniox returns the final transcript 54 ms after the end of speech and Deepgram Nova-3 60 ms. On Coval, Deepgram Nova-3 measures 85 ms, Flux 98 ms and ElevenLabs Scribe v2 Realtime 121 ms. The network distance between your server and the provider adds to these figures, so measure from where your agent runs.

### What is the cheapest streaming speech to text API?

Soniox costs $0.12 an hour of streamed audio, about $0.002 a minute. OpenAI gpt-4o-mini-transcribe and Meta Muse Voice Transcribe cost about $0.18 an hour, and xAI Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 $0.20. Running Whisper or the first Voxtral Realtime on your own hardware removes the per-minute bill but adds the cost of the machine.

### Who does Deepgram compete with?

Deepgram competes with AssemblyAI, ElevenLabs Scribe, Soniox, Speechmatics, Google Gemini Transcribe, OpenAI’s transcription models, Cartesia Ink and xAI Grok Voice Transcribe for streaming speech to text. AssemblyAI is more accurate on the Coval benchmark, Soniox is cheaper, and Speechmatics has more deployment options. Deepgram remains the fastest to the final transcript on Coval.

### Which speech to text APIs can process audio in the EU?

AssemblyAI, Deepgram and Speechmatics run EU endpoints. Soniox opens an EU region on request. OpenAI processes data in Europe at 10% extra on recent models. Google offers an EU endpoint for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe on its Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform. Mistral processes data in Europe by default. Outside the ranking, Gladia can store data in Europe and Gradium has an EU endpoint. ElevenLabs reserves EU residency for Enterprise plans. xAI and Cartesia publish no European region.

### Can I self-host a streaming speech to text model?

Mistral publishes its first Voxtral Realtime model under Apache 2.0, so you can run it on your own GPU through vLLM. Voxtral Realtime 3 runs on your servers through a deal with Mistral. Speechmatics, Deepgram, AssemblyAI and Cartesia sell self-hosted or on-premises deployments, AssemblyAI from a $20,000 commitment.

### Do I need end of turn detection in the speech to text API?

A voice agent needs end of turn detection somewhere, but it can come from the API or from your own code. Deepgram Flux, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs, Cartesia and xAI detect it themselves, and Mistral Voxtral Realtime 3 when you turn it on. OpenAI gpt-live-transcribe expects your code to say when the sentence is over, for instance with voice activity detection in the browser.

### Is Whisper good enough for a real-time voice agent?

Whisper reads up to thirty seconds of audio at a time and was built for files, so streaming it means re-running it on a growing buffer or transcribing each sentence after it ends. OpenAI’s gpt-4o-transcribe costs $0.006 a minute, the price of Whisper on OpenAI’s API, and streams over the Realtime API. Whisper remains useful on your own server, where it costs nothing per minute and no audio leaves the machine.

## Getting started

Pick AssemblyAI when accuracy on names, numbers and addresses comes first, Deepgram when the time to answer matters most, and Soniox when the bill does. Gemini 3.5 Transcribe suits a multilingual agent, and Voxtral Realtime a European team that may host the open weights version itself later.

Whichever you choose, test it on your own calls, with real callers who pause, interrupt and switch language. Micdrop lets you swap the speech to text provider without touching the browser or the rest of the pipeline:

```bash
npm install @micdrop/server @micdrop/web @micdrop/gemini @micdrop/openai
```

You can [compare the transcription, agent and voice integrations](/docs/ai-integration), then [run a first voice call in about five minutes](/docs/getting-started).

## Keep reading

[![gpt-4o-transcribe vs Gemini Transcribe vs Voxtral](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fthumbnail.BjuDRaHH.jpg&w=1200&h=630&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

September 28, 2026

## gpt-4o-transcribe vs Gemini Transcribe vs Voxtral

OpenAI, Gemini, Voxtral and Gladia compared for live transcription in a voice agent: price per minute, languages, streaming accuracy and time to transcript.



](/blog/gpt-4o-transcribe-vs-gemini-vs-voxtral)

[![Whisper Streaming and Real-Time Transcription in TypeScript](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fthumbnail.Bj0kn5b8.jpg&w=1200&h=630&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

October 6, 2026

## Whisper Streaming and Real-Time Transcription in TypeScript

How microphone audio becomes live text over one WebSocket in Node: voice detection in the browser, 16 kHz PCM chunks, five messages and a streaming STT.



](/blog/real-time-transcription-websocket-typescript)

[![Best AI Voice Agent Platforms in 2026, Compared](/.netlify/images?url=_astro%2Fthumbnail.9uMD5qXK.jpg&w=1200&h=630&dpl=6adb0179788b76d7d71f8699)

September 13, 2026

## Best AI Voice Agent Platforms in 2026, Compared

This ranking compares ten AI voice agent platforms on price per minute, telephony, provider choice and EU hosting. Micdrop publishes it and sits fourth.



](/blog/top-ai-voice-agent-platforms)